{"id":358783,"date":"2025-11-07T10:49:18","date_gmt":"2025-11-07T15:49:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/?p=358783"},"modified":"2025-11-07T10:49:19","modified_gmt":"2025-11-07T15:49:19","slug":"actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/insurance\/homeowners\/actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost\/","title":{"rendered":"Actual cash value vs replacement cost"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1>Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement Cost: Understand the Differences<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement Cost<\/strong> affects both what you pay and how your claim is settled. RCV typically costs more because it pays without depreciation, while ACV deducts depreciation from the payout\u2014this difference has become more consequential as property loss costs and rebuild prices have stayed elevated into 2025. Industry sources attribute premium pressure to severe weather losses and reconstruction cost inflation; for example, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aon.com\">Aon<\/a> reported one of the costliest first halves on record in 2024 driven by U.S. severe convective storms, and carriers have tightened terms like roof RCV eligibility to manage costs, according to consumer\/regulatory guidance from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tdi.texas.gov\">Texas Department of Insurance<\/a>. At the same time, reinsurance markets stabilized at the January 1, 2024 renewals per <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gallagherre.com\/en\/insights\/1st-view-january-2024\">Gallagher Re<\/a>, tempering but not reversing rate momentum. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iii.org\/article\/what-is-the-difference-between-actual-cash-value-and-replacement-cost\">Insurance Information Institute<\/a> (Triple\u2011I) explains that RCV usually commands higher premiums than ACV because claim payments are larger when depreciation is not applied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"table-of-contents\">\n<h2>Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#what-is-actual-cash-value-coverage\">What Is Actual Cash Value Coverage?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#how-does-actual-cash-value-work\">How Does Actual Cash Value Work?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#what-is-replacement-cost-coverage\">What Is Replacement Cost Coverage?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#how-does-replacement-cost-work\">How Does Replacement Cost Work?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#guaranteed-vs-extended-homeowners-insurance-replacement-cost\">Guaranteed vs. Extended Homeowners Insurance Replacement Cost<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost-which-one-should-i-get\">Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement Cost, Which One Should I Get?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#the-bottom-line\">The Bottom Line<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>For those with homeowners or renters insurance, <strong>replacement cost<\/strong> is often preferred for large losses because it aligns payouts with current prices. If you need to file a <a class=\"achor-toggles\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/insurance\/homeowners\/most-expensive-types-of-homeowner-loss-claims\/\">major claim<\/a>, RCV avoids depreciation deductions (subject to policy limits). Consumer research shows settlement amount and clarity are the strongest drivers of claim satisfaction\u2014factors that tend to score higher when depreciation isn\u2019t reducing payouts (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jdpower.com\/business\/press-releases\/2024-us-property-claims-satisfaction-study\">J.D. Power<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jdpower.com\/business\/press-releases\/2024-us-home-insurance-study\">J.D. Power<\/a>). However, to control premiums and loss costs, many carriers now limit roof RCV based on age\/material and offer or default to ACV or roof schedules in hail\/wind regions (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tdi.texas.gov\">Texas DOI<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"what-is-actual-cash-value-coverage\">What Is Actual Cash Value Coverage?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Actual cash value (ACV) is the depreciated value of covered property at the time of loss\u2014essentially replacement cost minus depreciation. Regulators and industry groups define ACV this way and note that it generally results in lower premiums but smaller claim payments compared with RCV (<a href=\"https:\/\/content.naic.org\">NAIC<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iii.org\/article\/what-is-the-difference-between-actual-cash-value-and-replacement-cost\">Triple\u2011I<\/a>). Depreciation can be significant for fast\u2011cycle electronics: 2025 benchmarks show typical value loss over 24 months of ~40\u201350% for iPhones and ~65\u201375% for premium Android phones (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bankmycell.com\/blog\/cell-phone-depreciation\">BankMyCell<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sellcell.com\/blog\/\">SellCell<\/a>). Laptops also depreciate quickly: MacBooks ~50\u201360% by year two; many Windows laptops ~65\u201375% by year two (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.decluttr.com\/blog\/\">Decluttr<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because ACV subtracts depreciation, payouts for older or high\u2011wear items are lower. For example, if a base iPhone originally priced at $1,000 typically retains ~50\u201360% after 24 months, an ACV settlement could center around $500\u2013$600 (before deductible), whereas a comparable Android flagship might retain ~25\u201335% (~$250\u2013$350) at two years (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bankmycell.com\/blog\/cell-phone-depreciation\">BankMyCell<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sellcell.com\/blog\/\">SellCell<\/a>). For slower\u2011cycle goods, resale often caps at a fraction of original price; many working major appliances commonly transact for ~25\u201350% of original retail in secondary markets, implying roughly 10\u201320% loss in year one and ~10\u201315% annually thereafter (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.habitat.org\/restores\">Habitat ReStore<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"how-does-actual-cash-value-work\">How Does Actual Cash Value Work?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Insurers estimate ACV by determining the current replacement cost for an item of like kind\/quality and then deducting depreciation for age, wear, and obsolescence. Depreciation assumptions vary by category: for a two\u2011year\u2011old mid\u2011range Windows laptop originally $1,200, secondary\u2011market data showing ~65\u201375% value loss suggests an ACV of ~$300\u2013$420 (less deductible), while a two\u2011year\u2011old MacBook with ~50\u201360% loss might support ~$480\u2013$600 (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.decluttr.com\/blog\/\">Decluttr<\/a>). For large appliances, a simple planning rule is ~10\u201320% value loss in year one and ~10\u201315% in subsequent years, with many five\u2011year\u2011old units trading at ~20\u201340% of original price depending on brand\/condition (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.habitat.org\/restores\">Habitat ReStore<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"what-is-replacement-cost-coverage\">What Is Replacement Cost Coverage?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Replacement cost value (RCV) pays the cost to repair or replace with new materials of like kind and quality, without deducting depreciation, up to policy limits. Many policies pay ACV first and then release the remaining recoverable depreciation after you repair\/replace within the policy\u2019s deadlines and submit documentation\u2014an ACV\u2011then\u2011RCV two\u2011step flow emphasized by regulators and industry resources (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.insurance.wa.gov\">Washington Office of the Insurance Commissioner<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/content.naic.org\">NAIC<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iii.org\/article\/what-is-actual-cash-value-acv-and-replacement-cost-value-rcv\">Triple\u2011I<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RCV generally produces higher claim payments but costs more. In markets with frequent hail or wind losses, insurers often restrict roof RCV to newer or well\u2011rated materials, or apply ACV or age\u2011based roof schedules to manage loss costs\u2014tradeoffs highlighted by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tdi.texas.gov\">Texas Department of Insurance<\/a> and reflected in state frameworks like Florida\u2019s roof surface reimbursement schedules (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flsenate.gov\">Fla. Stat. \u00a7627.7011<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"how-does-replacement-cost-work\">How Does Replacement Cost Work?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>With RCV, many carriers pay ACV upfront and then reimburse recoverable depreciation after you complete repairs and provide proof within the policy timeframe. To speed and support this process, maintain a digital home inventory: photos\/video, make\/model, serial numbers, and receipts. Modern tools can scan barcodes (GTIN\/UPC) and use OCR to capture serials and receipt data, producing structured evidence that aligns with carrier claim portals (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.iii.org\/article\/creating-a-home-inventory\">Triple\u2011I: Creating a Home Inventory<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\">Wirecutter<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gs1.org\/standards\/barcodes\">GS1<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Best practices in 2025: record a room\u2011by\u2011room video walk\u2011through, attach e\u2011receipts\/PDFs, store backups in the cloud, and export your list (CSV\/PDF) annually. Insurers are scaling AI for document ingestion and virtual assessments, so clean, machine\u2011readable proofs can accelerate settlement (<a href=\"https:\/\/www2.deloitte.com\">Deloitte<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iii.org\/article\/creating-a-home-inventory\">Triple\u2011I<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"guaranteed-vs-extended-homeowners-insurance-replacement-cost\">Guaranteed vs. Extended Homeowners Insurance Replacement Cost<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Extended replacement cost (ERC) typically adds a cushion\u2014often +10% to +50%\u2014above your dwelling limit if rebuild costs exceed Coverage A at the time of loss. Guaranteed replacement cost (GRC), where available, commits to rebuild even if costs exceed limits (subject to policy terms). These endorsements have become more valuable as reconstruction costs remain materially above pre\u20112020 levels and can surge after disasters (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/ppi\/\">BLS PPI<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.corelogic.com\">CoreLogic<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/content.naic.org\">NAIC: Demand Surge<\/a>). Regulators also emphasize adequate Ordinance or Law (code\u2011upgrade) coverage\u2014often 10% by default, with options to raise to 25%\u201350%+\u2014to cover code\u2011driven costs that basic limits may not (<a href=\"https:\/\/content.naic.org\">NAIC<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Staying properly insured means updating your Coverage A valuation regularly and confirming inflation guard settings so limits keep pace with local labor\/material trends. Carrier re\u2011valuations and stronger insurance\u2011to\u2011value discipline can increase premiums but reduce underinsurance risk at claim time (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.corelogic.com\">CoreLogic<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iii.org\/article\/what-is-actual-cash-value-acv-and-replacement-cost-value-rcv\">Triple\u2011I<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost-which-one-should-i-get\">Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement Cost, Which One Should I Get?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Choose based on budget tolerance and claim\u2011time expectations. RCV generally offers better protection against inflation and depreciation and is preferred when affordable\u2014consistent with research showing settlement amount and clarity are top drivers of satisfaction (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jdpower.com\/business\/press-releases\/2024-us-property-claims-satisfaction-study\">J.D. Power<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iii.org\/article\/what-are-actual-cash-value-and-replacement-cost\">Triple\u2011I<\/a>). ACV lowers premium but shifts depreciation risk to you: for planning, use 24\u2011month depreciation benchmarks (e.g., iPhone ~40\u201350% loss; premium Android ~65\u201375%; MacBook ~50\u201360%; many Windows laptops ~65\u201375%) to estimate potential payout gaps if you suffer a contents loss (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bankmycell.com\/blog\/cell-phone-depreciation\">BankMyCell<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sellcell.com\/blog\/\">SellCell<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.decluttr.com\/blog\/\">Decluttr<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Given 2025 market conditions\u2014elevated loss costs from severe weather, stabilized but disciplined reinsurance, and tighter roof terms\u2014compare quotes for ACV vs. RCV and verify roof settlement (RCV or ACV\/schedule), wind\/hail percentage deductibles, inflation guard, and Ordinance or Law limits. State frameworks (e.g., Florida roof schedules) and consumer guidance (e.g., Texas DOI roof ACV vs. RCV) highlight why these details matter for claim outcomes (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.aon.com\">Aon<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gallagherre.com\/en\/insights\/1st-view-january-2024\">Gallagher Re<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ciab.com\">CIAB<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flsenate.gov\">Fla. Stat. \u00a7627.7011<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tdi.texas.gov\">Texas DOI<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table table table-striped table-bordered table--bordered-top\"><table><tbody><tr><td><br><\/td><td><strong>Pros<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Cons<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Actual cash value<\/strong><\/td><td>Lower premium vs. RCV; can make coverage more affordable in high-risk areas<br>Common option for older roofs in hail\/wind regions per regulator guidance<br><\/td><td>Depreciation reduces claim payments (e.g., typical 24\u2011mo losses: iPhone ~40\u201350%, Android flagship ~65\u201375%, many Windows laptops ~65\u201375%)<br>May not cover current replacement prices; larger out-of-pocket at claim time<br>Roof ACV or schedules can significantly limit payouts on aging roofs<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Replacement cost<\/strong><\/td><td>Settles without depreciation up to limits; ACV paid first then recoverable depreciation after repair\/replacement<br>Often standard for dwelling; contents RCV available via endorsement<br>Better aligns with reconstruction cost inflation and demand surge effects<\/td><td>Higher premium than ACV; eligibility for roof RCV may depend on age\/material\/condition<br>Requires timely documentation and proof of repair to recover depreciation; deadlines apply under policy terms<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"the-bottom-line\">The Bottom Line<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>RCV generally provides stronger protection in today\u2019s environment of elevated catastrophe losses and higher rebuild costs, while ACV can lower premiums at the expense of larger depreciation gaps. Before choosing, verify roof settlement terms, percentage deductibles, inflation guard, and code\u2011upgrade coverage; consider ERC\/GRC for added cushion; and maintain a cloud\u2011backed, barcode\/OCR\u2011enabled inventory to streamline claims (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.aon.com\">Aon<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iii.org\/article\/what-is-actual-cash-value-acv-and-replacement-cost-value-rcv\">Triple\u2011I<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/content.naic.org\">NAIC<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iii.org\/article\/creating-a-home-inventory\">Triple\u2011I: Inventory<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gs1.org\/standards\/barcodes\">GS1<\/a>). Policy availability and pricing may continue to evolve as states update frameworks (e.g., California\u2019s Sustainable Insurance Strategy enabling catastrophe modeling and recognition of reinsurance costs) (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.insurance.ca.gov\/01-consumers\/200-catastrophes\/Sustainable-Insurance-Strategy.cfm\">California DOI<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large wp-image-123\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/path\/to\/image.jpg\" height=\"\" width=\"\"  alt=\"Home insurance policy document\" class=\"wp-image-123\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Pair the right coverage (ACV vs. RCV) with updated limits and a cloud-backed inventory to avoid surprises at claim time.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement Cost: Understand the Differences Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement Cost affects both what you pay and how your claim is settled. RCV typically costs more because it pays without depreciation, while ACV deducts depreciation from the payout\u2014this difference has become more consequential as property loss costs and rebuild prices have [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":345,"featured_media":358784,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1268],"tags":[],"post_author":[6067],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Actual cash value vs replacement cost - Reviews.com<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Understanding Actual cash value vs replacement cost\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/insurance\/homeowners\/actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Actual cash value vs replacement cost - Reviews.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Understanding Actual cash value vs replacement cost\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/insurance\/homeowners\/actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Reviews.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Reviewscom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-07T15:49:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-07T15:49:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/Actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1440\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1148\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Reviews Staff\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Reviews\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Reviews\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Reviews Staff\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/insurance\/homeowners\/actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Actual cash value vs replacement cost\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/\",\"name\":\"Reviews.com\",\"description\":\"Your Guide to the Best Services\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Actual cash value vs replacement cost - Reviews.com","description":"Understanding Actual cash value vs replacement cost","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/insurance\/homeowners\/actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Actual cash value vs replacement cost - Reviews.com","og_description":"Understanding Actual cash value vs replacement cost","og_url":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/insurance\/homeowners\/actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost\/","og_site_name":"Reviews.com","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Reviewscom\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-07T15:49:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-07T15:49:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1440,"height":1148,"url":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/Actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Reviews Staff","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Reviews","twitter_site":"@Reviews","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Reviews Staff","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/insurance\/homeowners\/actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Actual cash value vs replacement cost"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/","name":"Reviews.com","description":"Your Guide to the Best Services","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358783"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/345"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=358783"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358783\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/358784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=358783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=358783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=358783"},{"taxonomy":"post_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_author?post=358783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}